Daily Job Scout

The first one-to-one agenda: eight questions, in order

Eight questions for one meeting, sequenced so the two that matter most are still answerable by the time you get to them.

Two people talking across a small table with a notebook open between them

The first one-to-one with a new manager is the only meeting where knowing nothing is free. Six weeks later the same questions cost you something, because by then you are supposed to have found the answers yourself. Most advice treats it as a chance to make an impression, which spends the one thing it is good for.

So do not bring a plan. Bring eight questions in this order. The order does most of the work: the early ones are cheap to answer and establish that you are asking about the job rather than about yourself, which is why the last two get a straight answer.

Why the order is the argument

Questions about history and process get honest answers from almost anyone. Questions about judgment and how you will be assessed do not, until the person has spent twenty minutes answering easier ones.

Plan for forty-five minutes, or thirty if that is what there is. Eight is more than you will get through if you follow up properly, and following up is the point. Question five with three real answers beats question eight with polite ones.

The first three are about the job

"What does a good first month look like to you?"

Tells you whether a plan exists. A specific answer means someone thought about the role before filling it. A vague one, settle in and meet people, means you will be writing that plan yourself, and it is better to learn that now than in a month.

"Who was doing this work before I got here?"

Tells you whose workload you are taking, and who may quietly resent either the relief or the loss. It sits second because people answer history plainly, and it hands you your first three names.

"What is broken that everyone has stopped mentioning?"

Tells you the real backlog, which is never the one in the onboarding document. Asked third it reads as diligence. Asked first it reads as a critique of a place you have not worked.

The middle two are about how work moves

"When something needs a decision, who actually decides?"

Tells you the approval map, which rarely matches the org chart.

On a floor, a ward or a site this saves you a week. The schedule, an overtime signoff, a swap, a return-to-work note and a broken machine are commonly owned by five different people, and only one is the supervisor who hired you. Ask for all five names.

"How do you want to hear bad news, and how fast?"

Tells you the escalation norm: a message within the hour, the next one-to-one, or never late on a Friday. It is a preference question, easy to answer, and it makes the three that follow feel like the same kind of question rather than a shift in register.

The last three are the ones people skip

"Who should I be talking to who is not already on my calendar?"

Tells you where the informal authority sits. Ask for names plus one line on why each. It also gives you standing to approach people you have never met, which you will want almost immediately.

"If this role goes well, what does it look like in a year?"

Tells you whether the job has a direction or was created to absorb overflow. Both are survivable. Only one is worth planning around, and you want to know which before you turn down the next thing that comes along.

"How will I know you are unhappy with my work before it becomes a formal conversation?"

Tells you whether this manager says difficult things out loud. It has to go last. At the top it sounds anxious. After forty minutes of specifics it sounds like someone setting up a working relationship, and the answer, or the visible absence of one, is worth the meeting.

Two answers to write down verbatim

Capture the decision-maker's name and the bad-news preference word for word. Those two are what you act on under pressure, and a paraphrase written from memory a week later is usually a paraphrase of what you expected to hear.

What to leave off the agenda

Leave out title, raise timing, vacation you booked before you accepted, and your read on the team. The first three deserve their own conversations. The fourth you have not earned.

Leave out a written plan of your own. Any plan drafted before you can answer the decision-maker question is built on an org chart you have misread.

The questions are not a test of the manager. They are the cheapest way to learn what you would otherwise learn by getting something wrong in public.

The reply that is worth more than the meeting

Before you leave, ask one thing: "Can I write back with what I understood, so you can correct it?" Then send five or six lines: the shape of a good first month, the names you were given, the one thing you will pick up first. Most managers correct exactly one item, and that correction is usually worth more than the hour you just spent.

If your manager does not run one-to-ones at all, common in shift work and small operations, ask for twenty minutes at the start or end of a shift and use four of the eight: the first month, who was doing this before, who actually decides, and how you will hear about problems. The rest waits for a quieter week.

If there is no work email to write back to, send a text or write it on a half sheet and hand it over. The medium does not matter. Having a version they corrected does.

General information about work in the United States, not legal, tax, immigration, medical or financial advice. Pay, hours, leave and licensing rules differ by state, by city and by contract, and change over time. Check anything here against your own documents and, for anything you would act on, take advice from a qualified professional in your state. Get in touch with any questions about this post.

More like this

Everything in at work →